Difference between revisions of "Rankings by City"
Wikieditor (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "In this page, you can find relevant city brand rankings and how the information is obtained and analyzed. If there are any other rankings that you feel should be included here...") |
Wikieditor (Talk | contribs) (→Anholt – Gfk City Brands Index Top 10) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Anholt – Gfk City Brands Index Top 10== | ==Anholt – Gfk City Brands Index Top 10== | ||
| + | ===Anholt – Gfk City Brands Index Methodology=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Anholt-GfK City Brands Index (CBISM) measures the power and appeal of each city’s brand image. The study gives a holistic perspective of each city, looking at six key dimensions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. '''Presence''': Based on the city's international status and standing and the global familiarity/knowledge of the city. It also measures the city's global contribution in science, culture and governance. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. '''Place''': Exploring people's perceptions about the physical aspect of each city in terms of pleasantness of climate, cleanliness of environment and how attractive its buildings and parks are. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. '''Pre-requisites''': Determines how people perceive the basic qualities of the city; whether they are satisfactory, affordable and accommodating, as well as the standard of public amenities such as schools, hospitals, transportation and sports facilities. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. '''People''': Reveals whether the inhabitants of the city are perceived as warm and welcoming, whether respondents think it would be easy for them to find and fit into a community that shares their language and culture and whether they would feel safe. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. '''Pulse''': Measures the perception that there are interesting things to fill free time with and how exciting the city is perceived to be in regard to new things to discover. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 6. '''Potential''': Measures the perception of economic and educational opportunities within the city, such as how easy it might be to find a job, whether it's a good place to do business or pursue a higher education. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Recently, the Anholt-GfK City Brands Index (CBI) measured the image and reputation of 50 cities. The table below provides top 10 City Brands according to Anholt-GfK ranking. | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="line-height: 0.9em; border:1px #000000;" cellspacing="0" align="left" style="margin-left: 1em; text-align:left;" | {| class="wikitable" style="line-height: 0.9em; border:1px #000000;" cellspacing="0" align="left" style="margin-left: 1em; text-align:left;" | ||
| Line 32: | Line 49: | ||
| 10 || Melbourne || Washington D.C. | | 10 || Melbourne || Washington D.C. | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Resonance – World’s Best City Brands Top 10 == | == Resonance – World’s Best City Brands Top 10 == | ||
Revision as of 14:11, 24 October 2017
In this page, you can find relevant city brand rankings and how the information is obtained and analyzed. If there are any other rankings that you feel should be included here, please feel free to write about them in the 'discussion' section.
To find out more information about the companies and individuals involved in these rankings, please go to the Experts page.
Contents
- 1 Anholt – Gfk City Brands Index Top 10
- 2 Resonance – World’s Best City Brands Top 10
- 3 The Economist –The Global Liveability Ranking
- 4 Monocle –The Most Liveable Cities Index
- 5 Mercer – Mercer's Quality of Living Ranking
- 6 Momentum – City Momentum Index
- 7 Institute for Urban Strategies/The Mori Memorial Foundation – Global Power City Index
- 8 Reputation Institute – City RepTrak
Anholt – Gfk City Brands Index Top 10
Anholt – Gfk City Brands Index Methodology
The Anholt-GfK City Brands Index (CBISM) measures the power and appeal of each city’s brand image. The study gives a holistic perspective of each city, looking at six key dimensions:
1. Presence: Based on the city's international status and standing and the global familiarity/knowledge of the city. It also measures the city's global contribution in science, culture and governance.
2. Place: Exploring people's perceptions about the physical aspect of each city in terms of pleasantness of climate, cleanliness of environment and how attractive its buildings and parks are.
3. Pre-requisites: Determines how people perceive the basic qualities of the city; whether they are satisfactory, affordable and accommodating, as well as the standard of public amenities such as schools, hospitals, transportation and sports facilities.
4. People: Reveals whether the inhabitants of the city are perceived as warm and welcoming, whether respondents think it would be easy for them to find and fit into a community that shares their language and culture and whether they would feel safe.
5. Pulse: Measures the perception that there are interesting things to fill free time with and how exciting the city is perceived to be in regard to new things to discover.
6. Potential: Measures the perception of economic and educational opportunities within the city, such as how easy it might be to find a job, whether it's a good place to do business or pursue a higher education.
Recently, the Anholt-GfK City Brands Index (CBI) measured the image and reputation of 50 cities. The table below provides top 10 City Brands according to Anholt-GfK ranking.
| Position 2013 | Position 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | London | Paris |
| 2 | Sydney | London |
| 3 | Paris | New York |
| 4 | New York | Sydney |
| 5 | Rome | Los Angeles |
| 6 | Washington D.C. | Rome |
| 7 | Los Angeles | Berlin |
| 8 | Toronto | Amsterdam |
| 9 | Vienna | Melbourne |
| 10 | Melbourne | Washington D.C. |
Resonance – World’s Best City Brands Top 10
| Position 2017 | |
|---|---|
| 1 | London |
| 2 | Singapore |
| 3 | New York |
| 4 | Paris |
| 5 | Sydney |
| 6 | Amsterdam |
| 7 | Los Angeles |
| 8 | Tokyo |
| 9 | San Francisco |
| 10 | Toronto |
The Economist –The Global Liveability Ranking
| Position 2017 | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Melbourne |
| 2 | Vienna |
| 3 | Vancouver |
| 4 | Toronto |
| 5 | Calgary |
| 6 | Adelaide |
| 7 | Perth |
| 8 | Auckland |
| 9 | Helsinki |
| 10 | Vancouver |
Monocle –The Most Liveable Cities Index
| Position 2017 | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Tokyo |
| 2 | Vienna |
| 3 | Berlin |
| 4 | Munich |
| 5 | Melbourne |
| 6 | Copenhagen |
| 7 | Sydney |
| 8 | Zurich |
| 9 | Hamburg |
| 10 | Madrid |
Mercer – Mercer's Quality of Living Ranking
| Position 2017 | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Vienna |
| 2 | Zurich |
| 3 | Auckland |
| 4 | Munich |
| 5 | Vancouver |
| 6 | Dusseldorf |
| 7 | Frankfurt |
| 8 | Geneva |
| 9 | Copenhagen |
| 10 | Basel |
Momentum – City Momentum Index
| Position 2017 | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Bangalore |
| 2 | Ho Chi Minh |
| 3 | Silicon Valley |
| 4 | Shanghai |
| 5 | Hyderabad |
| 6 | London |
| 7 | Austin |
| 8 | Hanoi |
| 9 | Boston |
| 10 | Nairobi |
Institute for Urban Strategies/The Mori Memorial Foundation – Global Power City Index
| Position 2017 | |
|---|---|
| 1 | London |
| 2 | New York |
| 3 | Tokyo |
| 4 | Paris |
| 5 | Singapore |
| 6 | Seoul |
| 7 | Hong Kong |
| 8 | Amsterdam |
| 9 | Berlin |
| 10 | Vienna |
Reputation Institute – City RepTrak
| Position 2016 | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Sydney |
| 2 | Vienna |
| 3 | Zurich |
| 4 | Toronto |
| 5 | Stockholm |
| 6 | Edinburgh |
| 7 | Montreal |
| 8 | Rome |
| 9 | Vancouver |
| 10 | Copenhagen |
