Difference between revisions of "Rankings by City"

From CountryBrandingWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Resonance – World’s Best City Brands Top 10)
Line 132: Line 132:
  
  
 +
 +
=== Resonance – World’s Best City Brands Top 10 Methodology ===
 +
 +
In the World’s Best City Brands Ranking, Resonance ranks the world’s best city brands using a combination of statistical performance and qualitative evaluations by locals and visitors in 20 different areas that we have grouped into six core categories.
 +
 +
1.    Place: Represents city’s perceived quality of a natural and built environment and atmosphere.
 +
 +
2.    Programming: Represents arts, culture and entertainment programmes and events in a city.
 +
 +
3.    Prosperity:  Provides an information about employment, GDP per capita and corporate head offices in a city.
 +
 +
4.    Product: The representation of key institution, attraction and infrastructure in a city.
 +
 +
5.    People: Shows the immigration and diversity rate of a city.
 +
 +
6.    Promotion: The identification of the number of articles, references, overviews and recommendations about a city which could be found online.
  
 
== The Economist –The Global Liveability Ranking ==
 
== The Economist –The Global Liveability Ranking ==

Revision as of 14:54, 24 October 2017

In this page, you can find relevant city brand rankings and how the information is obtained and analyzed. If there are any other rankings that you feel should be included here, please feel free to write about them in the 'discussion' section.

To find out more information about the companies and individuals involved in these rankings, please go to the Experts page.


Anholt – Gfk City Brands Index Top 10

Position 2013 Position 2015
1 London Paris
2 Sydney London
3 Paris New York
4 New York Sydney
5 Rome Los Angeles
6 Washington D.C. Rome
7 Los Angeles Berlin
8 Toronto Amsterdam
9 Vienna Melbourne
10 Melbourne Washington D.C.













Anholt – Gfk City Brands Index Methodology

The Anholt-GfK City Brands Index (CBISM) measures the power and appeal of each city’s brand image. The study gives a holistic perspective of each city, looking at six key dimensions:

1. Presence: Based on the city's international status and standing and the global familiarity/knowledge of the city. It also measures the city's global contribution in science, culture and governance.

2. Place: Exploring people's perceptions about the physical aspect of each city in terms of pleasantness of climate, cleanliness of environment and how attractive its buildings and parks are.

3. Pre-requisites: Determines how people perceive the basic qualities of the city; whether they are satisfactory, affordable and accommodating, as well as the standard of public amenities such as schools, hospitals, transportation and sports facilities.

4. People: Reveals whether the inhabitants of the city are perceived as warm and welcoming, whether respondents think it would be easy for them to find and fit into a community that shares their language and culture and whether they would feel safe.

5. Pulse: Measures the perception that there are interesting things to fill free time with and how exciting the city is perceived to be in regard to new things to discover.

6. Potential: Measures the perception of economic and educational opportunities within the city, such as how easy it might be to find a job, whether it's a good place to do business or pursue a higher education.

Recently, the Anholt-GfK City Brands Index (CBI) measured the image and reputation of 50 cities. The table above provides top 10 City Brands according to Anholt-GfK ranking.


Resonance – World’s Best City Brands Top 10

Position 2017
1 London
2 Singapore
3 New York
4 Paris
5 Sydney
6 Amsterdam
7 Los Angeles
8 Tokyo
9 San Francisco
10 Toronto













Resonance – World’s Best City Brands Top 10 Methodology

In the World’s Best City Brands Ranking, Resonance ranks the world’s best city brands using a combination of statistical performance and qualitative evaluations by locals and visitors in 20 different areas that we have grouped into six core categories.

1. Place: Represents city’s perceived quality of a natural and built environment and atmosphere.

2. Programming: Represents arts, culture and entertainment programmes and events in a city.

3. Prosperity: Provides an information about employment, GDP per capita and corporate head offices in a city.

4. Product: The representation of key institution, attraction and infrastructure in a city.

5. People: Shows the immigration and diversity rate of a city.

6. Promotion: The identification of the number of articles, references, overviews and recommendations about a city which could be found online.

The Economist –The Global Liveability Ranking

Position 2017
1 Melbourne
2 Vienna
3 Vancouver
4 Toronto
5 Calgary
6 Adelaide
7 Perth
8 Auckland
9 Helsinki
10 Vancouver













Monocle –The Most Liveable Cities Index

Position 2017
1 Tokyo
2 Vienna
3 Berlin
4 Munich
5 Melbourne
6 Copenhagen
7 Sydney
8 Zurich
9 Hamburg
10 Madrid













Mercer – Mercer's Quality of Living Ranking

Position 2017
1 Vienna
2 Zurich
3 Auckland
4 Munich
5 Vancouver
6 Dusseldorf
7 Frankfurt
8 Geneva
9 Copenhagen
10 Basel













Momentum – City Momentum Index

Position 2017
1 Bangalore
2 Ho Chi Minh
3 Silicon Valley
4 Shanghai
5 Hyderabad
6 London
7 Austin
8 Hanoi
9 Boston
10 Nairobi













Institute for Urban Strategies/The Mori Memorial Foundation – Global Power City Index

Position 2017
1 London
2 New York
3 Tokyo
4 Paris
5 Singapore
6 Seoul
7 Hong Kong
8 Amsterdam
9 Berlin
10 Vienna













Reputation Institute – City RepTrak

Position 2016
1 Sydney
2 Vienna
3 Zurich
4 Toronto
5 Stockholm
6 Edinburgh
7 Montreal
8 Rome
9 Vancouver
10 Copenhagen